Feb
25
2010

How to solve world hunger in 4 (or so) easy steps

Here’s how we do it.  We need to convince the oil companies that there is oil on Mars.  Stay with me here. The oil companies will then fund manned space flight to Mars so they can drill for the oil. If they eventually find it, it will prove there was once life there, which will cause the religious fundamentalists’ heads to all explode in unison (side benefit there).  Then, because using the oil on Mars would be way cheaper than shipping it to Earth (not to mention supply and demand), we could then send all of the SUVs and sports cars (and their drivers, another side benefit) to Mars.  This would also have the side benefit of decreasing congestion here. Then, all the green house gases from the SUVs and sports cars will cause global warming on Mars (Marsal warming?), which will then teraform Mars to be habitable. We can then grow food on Mars and solve world hunger, on two planets no less. The end.

Granted, the religious fundies would just deny that we had ever been to Mars, or claim the oil was put there by god 5,000 years ago to test their faith. And there would have to be oil on Mars in the first place. And we’d have to figure out how to make SUVs run at several hundred degrees below zero with double the gravity. And I have no clue how fertile Martian soil is. But I can dream, right?

Or maybe we could just reproduce less.

Comments (0) | Tags: , , , , , , | Written by Kearn on Feb 25,2010 |
Feb
19
2010

Free Idea Friday – Pothole Spotter

Continuing the driving theme I seem to have established over the past couple of days, the free idea this week is a Pothole Spotter website.

As bits of pavement are thawing here on the frozen tundra, the potholes seem notably worse than in past years.  Now, I’m no stranger to potholes, having lived in the upper Midwest my whole life, but some of the ones this year seem pretty exceptional.  Perhaps it’s the particular combination of weather this winter, or maybe it’s the result of reduced preventive maintenance on roads with budget cut back, I don’t know.  And mind you, I’m not talking about a little bit of pockmarked road acne here, I’m talking about the tire swallowing, axle breaking caverns.

I’ve got a few on my way to work that are so substantial that I’ve modified my usual route by a few blocks to get around them, because I’m worried I’ll end up with a flat tire one of these days if I don’t (again, these are no “just swerve around them” sized pot holes).

From what I’ve seen in past years here in Minneapolis, the city’s way of patching these is to methodically drive up and down every single street on the warm days, starting when it gets up to the 40’s or 50’s, and patch every single divot on a given street, from fist sized hiccup to black hole of death, all at once.  Which sort of makes sense in a “it’s the government” kind of way.  After all, how would they know where the really bad ones are?  Or the ones that the most people drive over in a given day?  And really, what are you going to do about it anyway?

Make a Pothole Spotter website.  That’s what.

The people who are going to know best where the really bad potholes are are the people who drive through them (or swerve around them) every day.  The commuters.  So, this week’s idea is to make website where users can submit their favorite / most hated potholes.  Ideally, you would set it up so they can send in picture messages of the potholes from their phones, so you can actually see how big / bad they are.  The users should also include a description of the location (for example, 31st Street E, about 10 feet west of Stevens Ave, all of the right lane), or maybe a Google Street View link (http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=Minneapolis,+Hennepin,+Minnesota&ll=44.946643,-93.275565&spn=0,359.997299&t=h&z=19&layer=c&cbll=44.946644,-93.2757&panoid=dtMqU1RZFncbKp_RddLBew&cbp=12,30.94,,0,1.07 – those two close parallel cracks at the end of the white stripe have each opened into tire sized gaps in the pavement).

The commuters would have incentives to use the site, because it could potentially help them get the worst of the potholes they have to deal with fixed quickly.  Additionally, you could offer a weekly prize for worst pothole, and let users vote on it.  The worst pothole each week would be displayed at the top of the home page. It would strike me that you could get a tire company or an auto shop (especially one that does alignments and tire balancing) or a tow truck company to sponsor the thing, and give related / amusing prizes each week.

Additionally, it would basically publicly shame the cities / street maintenance crews that are in charge of the areas where the potholes reside into fixing them.  Or, more positively, help the cities and crews to identify where they can have the greatest effect improving drivers’ experience with the least amount of manpower and resources.

You could also pit cities against each other to introduce a bit of competition to it for both the government officials and the users, and maybe get a bit of press for it in the mean time.  “Will Minneapolis or New York have the worst pothole this week?”  “Hey, did you see Miami beat us this week?!?  They don’t even have winter!  We gotta get out and find some big ones!”

Additionally, this would also give the cities a good resource for concrete data (pardon the pun) about which streets have the most issues, which could drive the choices  on which ones get priority in replacement, as well as better analysis of layouts / materials that lead to the most / worst potholes.  It could also give the ability to track which spots have potholes that reoccur each year, which could lead to analyzing the effectiveness of patches done at different temperatures, at different times, or by different crews.  In that way, you even potentially charge the cities a small fee to mine the data, or sell some consulting to analyze the data for them.

People would have smoother commutes, the city would have a greater affect of peoples daily lives with fewer resources, we gather more data to prevent future problems and promote accountability, and have some potential to make some cash on the side.  Make it so.

Comments (3) | Tags: , , , , , , | Written by Kearn on Feb 19,2010 |
Feb
18
2010

Who says you have to grow up

In driving through the Crosstown Common (where 35W and 62 overlap for about a mile) I had a thought.  If you’re not familiar with the area, as 35W approaches the Commons it narrows to two lanes, and 62 narrows to one lane, and they combine to be 3 lanes for the length of the Commons.  62 merges on to 35W from the left, and then exits off the right.

So, most people on 35W who want to stay on 35W bunch up in the left lane of 35W as they approach the Commons, as that’s the only lane that remains 35W through the Commons.  In doing so, they form a bit of a wall, which is all well and good, except that anyone who is on 62 and would like to remain on 62 has to move from the furthest left lane to the furthest right lane in order to stay on 62.  As you can imagine, fun is had by all and traffic tends to back up in all directions around it.  (They’re currently doing some massive construction to try to fix this, but at the moment, it’s still very much intact this way.)

Now, on most days this is the low light of the commute, by far, especially given the merging skills of the average Minnesotan.  But today it occurred to me while driving through this mess that, really, the highways are just playing a large scale game of Red Rover.  It made me smile the rest of the way home.

Comments (0) | Tags: , , , , , | Written by Kearn on Feb 18,2010 |
Feb
17
2010

Flair of the neighborhood

On the drive home from work, I saw a Honda Civic with the following on a bumper sticker:

Think about honking

if you [heart] conceptual art

I think in terms of flair which defines my neighborhood (Uptown), that may well take the top spot.  It knocks off the previous favorite, which I saw briefly after moving here, which was on an old VW bus and said something to the effect of:

Zero to sixty

in about twelve and a half minutes

Comments (0) | Tags: , , , , , | Written by Kearn on Feb 17,2010 |
Nov
04
2009

A couple of environmental links

Two different environmental / tech items I kind of like.

Aptera is a company working on make an super, super efficient car.  It sort of boarders between glorified motorcycle and tiny coupe, but interesting as a thought experiment if nothing else, though I think they have a few working prototypes floating around.

FloDesign Wind has a very different take on wind turbines as well.  The video is particularly interesting, though it’s a bit of a commercial for them as well.  Interesting for thinking about the different pros and cons of traditional wind power, and making a little more sense of how they’re set up when you see a field of them.  Personally, I still think solar concentrators with steam engines are the way to go.

Comments (0) | Tags: , , | Written by Kearn on Nov 04,2009 |
Sep
10
2009

Bicycle Rant

First off, this post has been brewing in my head for a while, so it’s the culmination of a lot of frustration and anger built up over a long time.  Not to mention the combination of lots of not totally related bicycle themed anger.  And it’s long.  Just warning you.

Second, let me tell you about the particular incident that happened today (one of several today in fact), that caused me to finally snap and get around to writing this rant.

On my way home from work, I was driving down 26th St.  If you’re not familiar with Minneapolis, 26th and 28th St are both one ways (going opposite directions) that are 2-3 lanes wide (varies as they go across town) that run from one side of Minneapolis to the other, and are accordingly the fastest way across town most of the time, and generally very busy.  They have stop lights about every 5 block on average, and a speed limit of 30, so most people go 35.  Scene set.

So, driving along 26th, with the 35 mph flow of traffic during rush hour, I notice a girl (okay, woman, probably 20’s-30’s) on her bike coming from my right down one of the side streets that crosses 26th.  There’s a stop sign on the cross street, and 26th doesn’t have a stop.  As this is just a couple blocks past a stop light, there’s a pretty large clump of cars coming down 26th, and I’m the second one back in the right lane.  The bicyclist doesn’t seem to be slowing much, even though she’s approaching a stop sign at a busy street.  I slow down a bit (to probably 30) because I’m an exceedingly cautious driver (not trying to paint myself in a glowing light here, just noting I regularly get made fun of for driving like a grandma).  I assume she’ll either stop somewhat quickly, or just turn and ride on the sidewalk, which I see bikers do all the time along 26th / 28th, because with all the traffic and the speed of traffic, biking on them is kind of nuts.

She does the biker not stop or turn on to the sidewalk, she doesn’t even slow down or look before blowing straight through the stop sign into traffic and half way across the lane in front of me.  Not even a glance.   I slam on the brakes HARD, and swerve into the other lane to avoid killing this girl, without being able to check if there is a car in the other lane first.  I still only manage to miss her by maybe a foot as I go careening, skittering what’s left of the loose gravel into the other lane.  Not only did I come incredibly close to ending up with this girl under my car, I also came within inches (like I’m not totally sure if my rear view mirror of my car touch their trunk lid or not) of clipping the car in the other lane just in front of me.  And when I say brake HARD, I mean pulling up the seal-coating hard.

A good half an hour later now my pulse is starting to approach a normal rate again.

The point I would really like to stress in all of that is that not only did I almost accidentally kill this girl due to her flagrant disregard of her own safety and traffic laws, she didn’t even glance to see if there were cars coming.

Not just that she didn’t slow down and turn her head a little.

No.

She didn’t even look in the general direction of oncoming traffic.  If she had been a half second later, or if I hadn’t slowed down just a little when I noticed her, she would have driven directly into the side of my car without even having seen me coming.  Even with the sound of cars screeching and swerving around her, she never glanced back that the pile up she almost caused.

So, let me now get to the main point of my post: Bikers, I’m trying to not kill you.  Please stop making this such a difficult task.

Now, I realize, like with all things, there may be 1,000 sane, respectful, safe bikers out there for every idiotic jack-ass like this one.  But this is still by no means an isolated incident of idiotic suicidal jack-assery.  I quite frequently see bikes fly through stop signs and cars having to slam on their brakes to not hit them.  Or bikes weaving on and off of the sidewalk to pass people or get around one-ways.  Or just flat out go the wrong way down one-ways.

Just TODAY, prior to this near homicidal experience, not 5 blocks before it in fact, there was a biker going the wrong way down the same one way street.  About two weeks ago I saw someone biking not only the wrong way down that same street, but he was going the wrong way while riding squarely DOWN THE CENTER STRIPE of the one way into a ton of traffic.  Every car slowed down and moved over so the biker could continue going the wrong way down the center of the one way safely (well, as safely as one can do that).

Here’s another one that wouldn’t usually be notable, as it falls more into the rude rather than suicidal category, except that it also happened TODAY.  I was going the other way, down 28th, on the way to work this morning. There was a biker in front of me going 12mph.  Exactly 12 mph.  In a 30.  Okay, it’s a bike, I try to be nice.  Again, I drive like a grandma, minus the perpetual left hand turn signal.  So, I go 11.5 mph for about 3 blocks until there is space to get in the other lane and pass him. I go around him and pull back into the right lane because I have to turn right in a few more blocks.  About a block after I pass him, we reach a stop light that’s red.  There’s five or six cars ahead of me already stopped.  The biker then cuts over into the gutter of the street, and passes all of us, on the right, while we’re stopped at the light.  He then pauses (not stops) at the light and goes through the red light, and pulls back out to take up the whole lane on the other side of the intersection.  So, several cars that were pretty courteous in giving him enough space have to go 12mph for another 5 blocks until they can pass safely again.  But why bother, because he’s just going to do it again at the next light, and every one after that, all the way across town.

Again, not something I would usually blog about, but rude, and something I see a lot.  Beyond that, it was on 28th.  Which is LESS THAN ONE BLOCK from the Midtown Greenway, which parallels 28th.  If you’re not familiar with the Greenway, it’s a dedicated commuter bike path.  It goes all the way across Minneapolis, one side to the other, and then lots more.  It’s bikes and pedestrians only.  It used to be rail road tracks, so it’s dead flat, and almost all the streets it crosses have bridges over it, so you don’t even have to cross streets as you bike.  It’s a bicycle highway.  It even has exit ramps.  Seriously.  Exit ramps.  It is, in short, the perfect place to bike.  Even more so if you’re trying to get across town.  Like you would on 26th / 28th if you were driving.  Which again, is the scene of all of the above.  Which just compounds the stupidity / rudeness of it all.

Now again, let me point out again, I have nothing against bicycling or bicyclist in general.  Overall I’d say it’s a great form of transportation / exercise / recreation.  It’s much better for the environment and communities in general than driving (less parking = less sprawl = less need for cars = less parking …. = more active and personable neighborhoods).  I’ve actually just been learning to bike (though that’s a post for another day).  And I’m fascinated by all the variations of bikes out there and all the modifications and so on.

But, it just seems like bikes bring out the self-righteous jack-ass in so many people.

Another bike related rant/story, while we’re on it.  Once, at a party, I was talking to a guy who is what I would deem a bicycle zealot.  We were discussing commuting to work and I mentioned that I couldn’t ride a bike (hadn’t learned yet), so I took the bus to work.  His response was, and I quote, “you actually ride in those fossil fuel burning behemoths?”  That’s right, I was taking mass transit rather than driving alone, and I was riding in “those fossil fuel burning behemoths.”  He then worked the phase “fossil fuel burning behemoths,” that exact phrasing, into the conversation 6 more times in about 3-4 minutes.  He may have said it more, but after the 6th time in a row with the same phasing and disdainful tone, I had to go refill my beer and remove my teeth from the tight clamp they had formed around my tongue.

Perhaps part of my anger on the subject of bicyclist and their interactions with cars comes from the status of bikes.  As any biking zealot will tell you, bikes aren’t in the way of traffic, they are traffic.  And I couldn’t agree more.  I’m not sure if it was my parents, or my driver’s ed teacher, or just the laws in Iowa, but I always learned that as far as traffic laws go, bikes are cars.  Period.  A car has to signal when it turns.  So does a bike.  When you want to pass a car, you can only do so when there’s a striped center line, and you have to give the other car the whole lane as you pass it.  Same with bikes.  You have to stop at a stop light that’s red, and stay stopped until it turns green, even if there’s no traffic.  Same with bikes.  You can’t drive your car on the sidewalk.  Same with bikes.  You should follow at a distance far enough back so that no matter what stupid thing the person in front of you does, you can stop without hitting them.  Same when following bikes (bearing in mind they can come to a complete stop immediately if they fall over).  You can’t pass on the right, or in intersections.  Same for bikes.  You have to stop at stop signs and wait there if the cross traffic doesn’t have a stop.  Especially if you don’t want to be nearly run over.  With out looking.

This brings me to my secondary point / plea for bicyclists.  If you want to be treated like traffic, act like traffic.  Just like if you want to be treated like an adult, act like an adult.

If you keep jumping from the sidewalk to the street and back as is convenient to you, chances are good people won’t give you much space as they pass.  If you pass people on the right at stop lights, chances are pretty good that people won’t think twice of blowing right past you on the next block and will barely move out of their lane to do so.  And if you act responsibly, you’ll (probably) be treated with more respect.

This is also why I profoundly hate Critical Mass.  The “logic” for which seems to go something along the lines of: “We are traffic, so to prove it, we’ll ride around and violate every traffic law we can think of.  Not to mention we’ll purposely try to piss off the car drivers we would supposedly so like to have share the road with us.”  I also hate that they do this at 5pm, on Fridays, down town.  So, not only are they making drivers hate and loath bikes while reinforcing that bikes have no concern for their own safety and are self-righteous jack-asses, they’re doing it to people who are down town at 5pm on Fridays.  You know who is driving down town at 5pm on Fridays?  People whose live already suck.  They work in cubicals down town for massive faceless corporations, and not only that, they have already had the only great part of the work week (leaving an hour or even a half hour early on Friday) violated because their boss has decided that whatever deadline they were working on was more important than the weekend, happiness, or a social life.  You want to know when they should have Critical Mass?   At 2pm on Tuesdays.  Why?  Because if you’re out driving around at 2pm on a Tuesday your life is awesome already and could use a little evening out.  Plus, you’d probably be more sympathetic to the cause than overworked, burnt out, end of the week corporate slaves.  But I digress.

Not to say for a moment that every car driver is a saint or respectful either.  After all, there are plenty of BMW’s and Volkswagen Jettas on the road to attest to car driver jack-assery as well.  This isn’t meant to be a one sided argument.  We’re all on the road together here. (For Red Green fans, I’m pulling for you.)  And until there are a whole, whole lot more bike lanes than there are now, it’s going to stay that way.

I”m just saying that the more often that people see bikes do stupid, dangerous things when driving near cars, the more likely cars will be to do stupid, dangerous things when driving near bikes.  After all, if bikes (as a generalized whole concept in people’s minds) feel safe passing me one foot away, then they must feel safe if I do the same.  Right?  Again, the give and take of both sides figuring out what’s socially acceptable.

I’m still sticking to my bikes are cars view though.

And again bikers, I’m trying not to kill you.  I nearly wrecked my car today trying not to kill you.  Now would you please stop making it so damn hard?


Bonus side note:  Number of times jack-ass or some derivative was used in this post: 5.  Though counting this note, it’s 6, you fossil fuel burning behemoths.

Comments (0) | Tags: , , , , | Written by Kearn on Sep 10,2009 |
Aug
02
2009

Unicorn in C Major

Last football season I was driving down to Iowa City for a game.  Right as I got to the edge of town, this song came on the radio.  Needless to say once you start listening to it (NSFW), the radio version was heavily edited and bleeped.  As much as the uncensored version is sort of amusing, the censored version is absolutely hilarious, especially for the frequency and the lack of any real words towards the end when you count in the background singers.

It’s a bit like Adam Sandler’s “Ode to My Car“, which is far, far better when censored with car horns.  Again, with the backup singers. Unfortunately I can’t find the censored version of either of these.  Stupid internet and it’s lack of governing body trying to protect people from naughty language inadvertently making things funnier and more focused on the the bad words.  Now profanity laden, sort of average songs are just profanity laden, sort of average songs.

Comments (0) | Tags: , , , , | Written by Kearn on Aug 02,2009 |
Jul
30
2009

Let’s Repay America

Remember when Chrysler / Jeep / Dodge did their “Let’s Refuel America” guarantee of $2.99 gas for 3 years for anyone buying one of their new vehicles, in order to offset their cars being gas guzzlers?  Given that gas has been cheaper than $2.99 since October of last year (so they haven’t had to pay a dime to this program since then) how are they not swimming in cash?  How terrible of financial shape would they have been in if gas prices had actually kept going up?  How much more of your tax money would they be holding on to for you then?  Remind me again why we have any faith at all in them to not blow through every dime we give them?

Why we don’t let them fail, and let other car manufacturers buy up their facilities and equipment at bankruptcy sale prices and actually build decent cars with it that will sell under a realistic business model?  Honda and Toyota already have plants in the US.  Yes, that Japanese Honda Accord is made in Ohio, and that Japanese Toyota Tundra is made in Texas, in fact, most of their line up is built here.

Or, break Chrysler up under anti-trust laws into the three brands they’ve already made themselves, so parts of them can fail without taking out a huge sector of the economy.  (Same for GM.  Ford I’ll be gentle on for the moment since they actually show signs of being in tune with the market, have a reasonably sized line up, and didn’t take government funds.)  Anti-trust laws exist so the words “too big to fail” should never be uttered.  Too bad the government hasn’t really enforced them since the early to mid ’90’s.

Comments (0) | Tags: , , | Written by Kearn on Jul 30,2009 |
Jul
06
2009

Transformers: Revenge of the Bankrupt

It’s rare that a movie is so profoundly terrible that the reviews panning it can be so good, but apparently the new Transformers movie takes awful to a new level.  After reading the review, I kind of almost want to go see it to see if it is actually that bad, because it sounds impressive.  If so, perhaps the government could step in to help these GM models as well, after all, we can’t have our American movie characters failing.

I can just see the trailer for the third movie now – Transformers 3: Rise of the Honda:

Yeah, it’s not quite as intimidating, but I hear it gets twice the gas mileage, lasts forever, and has great resale value.

Review via Boing Boing.

Comments (0) | Tags: , , , | Written by Kearn on Jul 06,2009 |
Jun
30
2009

Top 5

I’m not entirely sure what to do with this, but I thought it was interesting.  A while ago, I bookmarked this graphic on Wikipedia:

Visifire

Source

Mainly, because I thought it was interesting that three of the top five largest (publicly traded) companies in the world are oil companies, and the fifth is a car manufacturer.

Jump forward a year (to the 2008 metrics), and the top four are exactly the same, in the exact same order.  Oh, but who’s in the five slot?  Toyota.  GM was at ninth.  And the rest of the top ten isn’t too short of oil companies either:

  1. Wal-Mart
  2. Exxon Mobil
  3. Shell
  4. BP
  5. Toyota
  6. Chevron
  7. ING
  8. Total (a European oil company)
  9. GM
  10. ConocoPhillips

Source: CNN Money via Wikipedia

Comments (0) | Tags: , | Written by Kearn on Jun 30,2009 |
Jun
09
2009

Custom 1964 Dodge Dart

I can’t decide if this (scroll about half way down, you won’t miss it) is one of the coolest or one of the most terrible custom cars I’ve ever seen.  For reference, this is what that car would look like stock.

Comments (0) | Tags: | Written by Kearn on Jun 09,2009 |
Mar
19
2009

The Hofmeister Kink

Okay, while we’re at it, one more BMW post.  Not sure how I got this many BMW links built up, especially since I prefer Acuras.  Though with how behind I am on posting things compared to bookmarking them, I would imagine I can probably get a fair number of themes going.

At any rate, did you know that all BMWs made since 1961 have one design feature in common?  The Hofmeister Kink.  It’s basically that the rear side window comes slightly back forward at the bottom instead of trailing back towards the rear of the car.  There’s an interesting article about it here.  One of those things you don’t really notice until someone mentions it, and then it’s everywhere in a million different little variations.

Via Kottke.

Comments (0) | Tags: , , , | Written by Kearn on Mar 19,2009 |
Mar
18
2009

Wireframe Corolla / Random Artist – Benedict Radcliffe

So, continuing my emerging theme here on the intersection of cars, form, visual illusion, etc, while at the same time proving I’m not just a BMW fan boy, I present you with a wire frame Corolla:

corola_wireframe

What’s that I hear you say?

“But Kearn, I’ve seen a million of these computer generated wire frame models of cars.”

Oh, I’m sure you have, but this one’s not computer generated, it’s a real sculpture:

corola_wireframe_on_truck

Kinda trippy, huh?  Took me a few looks to believe it was really and not computer generated too.  There’s more about it, and a few more pictures on AutoBlog.  Also a couple more on the artist’s website.  The artist that made it, Benedict Radcliffe, has a whole lot of cool stuff on his website. Definitely worth a look around. He’s also made a peddle Lamborghini that’s actually driveable.

Comments (0) | Tags: , , | Written by Kearn on Mar 18,2009 |
Mar
17
2009

3D kinetic sculpture

A really cool kinetic sculpture from the BMW museum.  As you’d expect, it’s has a tendency to show the shape of BMW’s, but really cool none the less.  Sort of a computer model in the real world.  A little slow to get going, but worth it, and also worth watching in the high quality mode (click the little “HQ” button on the bottom right).  The end is really cool.

Interesting for both the psychological aspect of how your mind creates images and connects the dots (literally) in 3D space, and the huge flexibility of what you could do with it.

Part of me thinks it wouldn’t be all that hard to make a rough equivalent of this thing.  A whole bunch of cheap computer controlled motors that don’t need to be powerful at all, a few ping pong balls, a can of silver spray paint, a reel of fishing line, and some free 3d modelling software like Blender.

More about it on the website of the company that made it, including some pictures of the guts of how it works.

Comments (0) | Tags: , , , | Written by Kearn on Mar 17,2009 |
Mar
16
2009

BMW shape shifter

So the guy in this one is pretty full of hot air, but the idea for the car is really cool.  It’s a concept car where they used cloth instead of metal for the skin of the car, which lets it change shape and flex and morph a little bit.  The hood splits open, the headlights blink like an eye, the spoiler deforms the trunk, and the tail lights show through the fabric.

Kind of wish it was more of the car and less of the guy selling the BMW brand, but cool none the less.

Really makes you wonder what all you could do with this.   Switch from a sports car to a sedan with the flip of a button.  Even change shape to make it more efficient and sleek at highway speeds, and still show off some really flared, stylized design around town.  Maybe change the color of it by having different lights underneath the skin shine through.  Maybe display messages on the sides of it.  Not something I would imagine you’ll see on the streets anytime soon, but kind of fun for making you think about cars and what they look like from a whole different angle.

Comments (0) | Tags: , , | Written by Kearn on Mar 16,2009 |

Powered by WordPress | Theme: Aeros 2.0 by TheBuckmaker.com with tweaks by Kearn