Aug
31
2010

State Fair Bingo – Part 2

If you’ve been reading the site for a year or more, you may remember the State Fair Bingo cards I posted last year.  If not, go read that and come back.  K, back now?  Good.

As you may notice on reading the cards, a few (read: almost all) of the squares on that version are vaguely to really, um, not so nice.  And, the squares are mostly the same across cards, just a little shuffled.  Well, Lazy Lightening to the rescue!  (via Because Emily Says So)  Lazy Lightening made up a whole, whole bunch of new ones, with way more options.  Also, there’s a kids edition, which, though less amusing, would seem like a good option for those who don’t want to keep them tucked away for most of the time.  Don’t worry, the new grown up version has some new squares that fit well with the old style ones too (I believe “Cougar on the prowl” is new, among others) though on the whole, it’s a bit more tame (for better or worse, depending on your view).

There’s now a part of me that, knowing these cards are at least reasonably well known now, wants to get together about 5 to 10 people, and dress up to make a complete blackout of one of the cards of the old version and walk around the fair for a day together, just to see how many people get it.

Comments (2) | Tags: , , , , , | Written by Kearn on Aug 31,2010 |
Aug
03
2010

Am I interupting?

Occasionally at work I feel a strange urge when walking past a meeting room.  You see, I work at a pretty large company currently, and there are lots of meeting rooms, and lots of people meeting in them, most of whom I don’t know and have probably never met.  And, in working at a large company, things tend to be very, very structured.  In fact, I would say that much of what we do is trying to keep things as ordered and predictable as possible.  No surprises for the customer.  Make sure we don’t have any surprises when we deploy this.  We have standards and processes and documentation to make sure that everything happens the way it’s supposed to, when it’s supposed to.  It’s not that this always works, but if there’s one main driving feel to the atmosphere of basically every large company I’ve been at, it’s that everyone should do everything they can to make sure everything goes the way it should.  Our work is laid out in Gantt charts.  Our meetings are scheduled days, week, and sometimes months in advance.  We send emails worded with an eye to who will be held accountable if things go awry.  Even our “spontaneous fun” is planned.  My team was planning to have a team outing where we would go to a Twins game.  We started planning which games were possibilities about a month and a half out.  We looked at the available teams, ticket prices, dates that conflict with likely overtime at work (we will of course be going in the evening or the weekend on our own time).  We narrowed down to a set of acceptable dates.  We assigned a point person to contact someone within the company who has organized this sort of thing before (we’re really not that big of a team).  We set a timeline of when we needed have a decision on tickets by, and contingencies for pushing out the time frame of games we’ll look at if we don’t have things lined up enough in advance.  We,… well, you get the idea.

Also, I’ve had it occasionally occur where I’ve walked into the wrong meeting in progress by accident, because I was at the right room number, but on the wrong floor (because all of the floors look alike except for being different shades of pastels with the life sucked out of them), or the meeting had been moved since I last checked my email.  And I’ve found, without fail, that every one in the meeting room stops, looks at you expectantly, and waits for you to say something.  At which point you need to sheepishly apologize and slink out.  The fortunate part is that it’s a big enough place that there’s a good chance no one will recognize you later to make you re-live it or know who you are to complain to your boss about it (especially good since one time when I accidentally did this I’m pretty sure the people in the meeting were CEO-type level folks who all looked quite serious and were obviously in mid argument – slinked out of that one fast).

So, occasionally as I wander past meeting rooms, I feel the intense need (haven’t done it yet, just felt the urge) to lean in, wait for everyone to pause and look at me expectantly, and then say something that’s just random enough to completely stop the conversation, but just potentially relevant enough to have people feel the intense need to discuss whatever it is I’ve just said, as they’re so used to any information being provided being provided for a relevant, structured reason, and then lean back out, close the door, and walk away.

If one were planning this, it would also help that all of our meeting rooms show up in Outlook, and will show on their calendars when they’re in use, and (usually) what the meeting is about, and who is attending.  So, you could easily cherry pick meetings to be ones where you know that most of the people won’t know each other (so you can actually come in an sit down for a while before someone questions you), where the topic will be really dull (weekly status meetings), or everyone’s going to be a bit slow to wake up and respond (hour six of an all day training session on the new time entry tool).

For instance (with stage directions):

(lean in, look around the room at everyone happily and slightly expectantly)
“The ice cream is ready.”
(nod head quickly twice, smile, and exit)

(lean half way in the door, offhandedly and somewhat disinterested)
“Your pizza is here.”
(exit)

(at a first meeting of teams, two steps in, somewhat angry and sharply, looking around dartingly)
“The toilet is plugged again.”
(pause just long enough to imply that you’re looking for a response, but not long enough to get one, stomp out.)

(at a routine, but long meeting, preferably without any high level managers, briskly, but casually enter and circle the table, tap people on the head as you go by)
“Duck, duck, duck, duck…”
(continue until you have made a full lap of the table and no one has said anything directly to you, and exit without saying goose.  If anyone says anything to you or becomes angry during your lap, continue until you get to them (do another half lap if necessary), tag them goose and sprint out of the room at full speed.)

(at a meeting of high level managers, lean in, look directly at whomever is speaking and interrupt)
“Call on line one.”
(nod reassuringly and expectantly, exit)

(at large meeting where it is likely no one knows each others, such as the kick off of a new project or initiative, walk in absent mindedly as if you meant to be at this meeting but were delayed.  sit next to whomever is talking, preferably a man, stare at him until he pauses, calmly)
“There was nothing you could have done to save her”
(pat him on the back, and walk out) (related xkcd allusion)

(any meeting at all, walk in somewhat quickly and flustered, look under the table)
“Has anyone seen my poodle?”
(wait for responses, but don’t provide any more information, exit)

Feel free to add your own in the comments.

Comments (1) | Tags: , , , , , , | Written by Kearn on Aug 03,2010 |
Jul
12
2010

A Brief, Incomplete, and Mostly Wrong History of Programming Languages

A Brief, Incomplete, and Mostly Wrong History of Programming Languages is the funniest thing I’ve read in months.  I actually fell out of my chair laughing.  That said, I’m pretty sure you have to be a huge, enormous, mega-nerd computer geek with a decent understanding of the history of programming languages to really get much of any of the humor of it.  But if you are a huge, enormous, mega-nerd computer geek with a decent understanding of the history of programming languages, it doesn’t get much better than this.  Snip:

1964 – John Kemeny and Thomas Kurtz create BASIC, an unstructured programming language for non-computer scientists.

1965 – Kemeny and Kurtz go to 1964.

Via Boing Boing.

Comments (0) | Tags: , , , , , | Written by Kearn on Jul 12,2010 |
Jun
12
2010

A simple guide to college conference re-alignment

There seems to be a lot of talk around the shifting college conference landscape lately. So, I thought I would take it upon myself to try to clear things up.

So far, we know for sure that Colorado is leaving the Big 12 for the Pac-10.  If things were to stop with this, the Pac-10 would then have 11 teams, as would the Big 12 (11). However, it would seem a lock that Nebraska will be leaving the Big-12 (now 11) as well. They would be headed to the Big 10, which currently has 11 teams, which with Nebraska would be 12.  So, we would have 12 Big 10 teams, 10 Big 12 teams, and 11 Pac 10 teams.  One would have to assume this would beget renaming the conferences to align with their new number of institutions, to make the Big 10 the Big 12, the Big 12 the Big 10, and the Pac 10 the Pac 11 unless we throw out USC for their recent violations making the Pac 10′s 11 10 again.

However, it doesn’t stop there. There’s more talk that the Big 12 with 10 teams (not to be confused with the Big 10 with 12 teams that had 11 before) could further loose more teams to any mix of the Pac 10 (11), the Big 10 (12), or the SEC (number withheld to protect the innocent). If, from the remaining Big 12′s 10 teams, Texas and Texas A&M were to leave for the Pac 10 (11 carry the two for 13) that would leave the Big 12 with 8 teams, not to be confused with the former Big 8, which became the Big 12 when they added 4 teams (how reasonable), and would make the Pac 10 13, the Big 10 12, and the Big 12 8 (but not, mind you, the Big 8).

With all of this, there is of course speculation that both the Pac 10 now 13 and the Big 10 now 12 (but not the Big 12, or 8) would then want to continue to expand to 16 teams each, further dissolving the Big 12 to the Little One. This would thus make the Pac 10 16 and the Big 10 16 and the Big 12 one, and we could then just rename them all to the Pac 16, the Big 16, and the Big Nothing Plus One (presumably Iowa State on both accounts), removing a lot of confusion.

And, never failing to look long term, one could see a day where the Pac 16 and the Big 16 would want to merge into one super-conference which would of course be known by one of two names.

In the first case, the conference would be known as Every Relevant Football Team – West, which would then compete with Every Relevant Football Team – East, aka the merged SEC/ACC, aka SAC, and thus replacing the BCS with the ERFT playoffs, which the ERFT-West would dominate.  The yearly playoff would thus be nicknamed The Annual SAC Kicking Contest.  The beer commercials at half time would be epic.

In the second case, the merged Pac 16 and Big 16 would choose to combine their names to form the Pig 32, which the still excluded and horribly confused Iowa State would attempt to mate with, producing a new, wildly deformed chimera offspring conference. The new Monster Conference would by genetics consist half of relevant football teams, and half of Iowa State, thus mirroring the current Iowa / Iowa State rivalry, but on a much larger and more horrifying scale. I’m also pretty sure it would be a signal of the end times.

Notre Dame (still independent) would then attempt to engage in a battle (football) with Monster Conference in a final contest of good vs evil (I’ll let you be the judge as to which side is which in a half-pig/half-ISU vs Fainting Irish contest) in order to bring about the Apocalypse as foretold in the book of Revelations.  However, Monster Conference would be confused as to whom “Notre Dame” is, as it would have long since been relegated to little more than a folk tale among devoted Catholics and viewers of NBC, with little recognition in the outside world.  Monster Conference would then assume the challenge from “Notre Dame” was just a prank phone call and hang up, thus avoiding the Apocalypse and making the world immortal.  Logically this would cause my Iowa Hawkeyes to be crowned The World Champions Of All College Football Forever Amen.  This would of course take place at the Rose Bowl.

Hope that clears everything up.

Jun
01
2010

Violent protesting doesn’t work

When was the last time you heard a lawmaker say, “You know, I was always for the war on terror, but then I saw a 19 year old in a grateful dead t-shirt and a fuck you hat light a dumpster on fire, and I said to myself, you know, maybe I’ve been wrong about foreign policy, maybe I’ve been wrong about a lot of things.”

Comments (0) | Tags: , , | Written by Kearn on Jun 01,2010 |
May
11
2010

Internet Commenter Business Meeting

What if the business world functioned the way internet comment sections do… (NSFW)

Honestly I’m not sure if that’s better or worse than the current state of things.

Comments (0) | Tags: , , , , , | Written by Kearn on May 11,2010 |
May
07
2010

Vanity never looked so good

On the way home from work, I saw a car with vanity license plates that just said:

WHEE

Awesome.  How could you not smile getting into a car with license plates that say WHEE?

On another note entirely, I checked the Minnesota DOT website to see how much customized plates are, because there still has to be some combination like WHEEE or WHEEEE or WEEEEE still left out there that I could get.  And I was quickly reminded of yet another way Iowa is better than Minnesota (beyond the selling alcohol on Sundays, selling alcohol in gas station and grocery stores, lower taxes, actually thawing / ice melting during the winter, and, of course, being the Hawkeye State).

In Iowa, personalized plates run you an extra $25, it’s an easy one page form, you can get them for a huge variety of causes, you can get them in your school colors, and you can see what they actually look like before ordering them.

In Minnesota, it’s ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHT DOLLARS AND FIFTY CENTS for personalized plates.  And you can use their four page long government form to try to figure out how to apply for them (god help you).  Now granted, if you look long enough, you can get custom plates in Minnesota for your school, though not in your school colors.  They’re right in there with where you get the plates for your Concrete Pumper or your Street Sweeper.

May
01
2010

Beefcake. BEEFCAKE!!!!!!!!

For the last several months, one of my sisters has been on a serious fitness kick.  Not like a, “I’m going to run a 5K by the end of summer,” or, “I’m only going to eat fast food twice a week,” kind of fitness kick.  We’re talking regular sessions with a personal trainer, weight lifting, track the exact composition of everything you eat, bulk up, and maybe learn some martial arts style fitness kick.  Maybe “fitness kick” isn’t even really the right term for it.  “Get in awesome shape quest”?  “Fitness rampage”?  Something like that.

At any rate, along with all the weight lifting and muscle building, she’s gotten pretty big on protein shakes and whey powder and the like.  We went on a brief vacation, and one of the first things we did after getting there was stop by a vitamin store to get some whey powder.  This, of course, lead to me making fun of her for the rest of the trip (this is how my family shows affection, we mock each other pretty much all the time).  In particular, it made me think of the South Park episode where Cartman decides he’s going to get totally buff:

So he gets a bunch of “Weight Gain 4000″, and gets, well, he ends up like this (starts about 20 seconds in):

The full episode is here.

So, of course, every time my sister made a protein shake, or asked if it was time for dinner yet, I would reply, “Beefcake. BEEFCAKE!”.  This was also accompanied by the Tim Tebow drinking game – while watch college football at any point in the last season, drink any time the announcers mention Tim Tebow.  Two if he’s not on the field at the time.  Three if neither of the teams playing in the game you’re watching is Florida.  You get trashed, fast.

Anyway, after the trip, my sister’s job was getting her down, so I thought I’d send her a care package.  What did I think of?  Well, I thought I’d get a variety of protein bars so she could try out some different kinds, maybe a few she hadn’t had before:

Titan. Rockin' Roll. Pure Protein. Yep, I picked them for having the most over the top labels and names of the whole rack of bars. Oh, and one chocolate one, because I'm not a total jerk. At least not all the time.

And of course, we can’t show affection without some mocking thrown in, so, while I was at it, I cut a couple of sheets of paper in half and made a few custom labels:

Also a good excuse to play with crayons. I love crayons.

After all, the labels make it easier to put stamps on them…

Pretty sure the post office loves me after this.

So I put her address on the back of the labels like the usual ingredients / nutritional facts label, and went to the post office to get the correct postage for each.  The post lady working weighed each one, and then put elaborate combinations of 5 or 6 stamps on each to get the correct amount, to the penny, for each of the four, including mixing up two the weights and going back and doing them over, until basically the entire back of each of them was covered in stamps.  The people behind me in line totally loved me by time I left.  I then mailed them off, one at a time, over the course of a little over a week.

Pretty sure I should turn this into a side business.

Beefcake.  BEEFCAKE!!!!

Comments (1) | Tags: , , , , | Written by Kearn on May 01,2010 |
Apr
27
2010

Craig Ferguson

In case you happen to be up late some weeknight and are looking for something to watch, might I suggest Craig Ferguson.  If you like the humor around here, he’s like that, only about eight thousand times better.

He’s on after Letterman.

The really great part of the show is that unlike all the other late night shows where they just read off of cue cards, Craig just has an outline of topics and makes stuff up as he goes.  And it shows.  It’s basically just him rambling by himself (no band, no side kick (okay, he does have a robotic skeleton sidekick, but I don’t know that it really counts) ), and he’s actually funny enough to make it work.  Obviously, it’s hit or miss depending on the night since he’s making it up as he goes, but on the whole it’s one of the only things on television that consistently makes me laugh out loud pretty much every time I watch it.

It’s also kind of nice that being on late, it starts off with the best part and slowly tappers from there.  He does a little 2-3 minute skit to lead of the show, which is usually pretty good and occasionally involves singing hand puppets (that sort of gives you an idea of the tone of the show).  Then there’s the monologue which is hit or miss but also usually pretty good.  We then go to the desk for email/twitters/random guest.  If it’s email or twitter it’s usually good, if it’s random guest, go to bed.  Then we have interview with some kind of sort of celebrity, which is rarely worth staying up for, but occasionally decent.

I not only love his delivery and overall style, as well as making it up as he goes, but I also love that he jumps back and forth between being a show based nearly entirely on poop and fart jokes to making obscure reference to Dali or Kierkegaard.  Seriously.

And really, let’s take a quick run through the list of what else is on for late night talk shows:

  • There is (or in this case, was) Conan.  Vaguely entertaining, but doesn’t really make me laugh, and I have a sort of deep rooted hatred for him stemming from a college roommate I had who watched him every night, loudly, even when I had early classes the next day.
  • There’s Letterman.  Umm, “Is this anything?” and “Will it float?” are entertaining, but only happen once in a blue moon.  Aside from that it was vaguely funny while Conan and Leno were fighting it out, but on the whole it’s mostly just sound to have on, and Paul Shaffer being a continuous public service announcement for why you shouldn’t spend decades doing drugs.  (Okay, so Craig apparently did lots of drug for a couple decades too, but has since cleaned up.)
  • There’s Jimmy Fallon.  And that’s just painful.  Have you ever watched it?  Did you too think that it must have just been an off night, and tried watching part of it again another night, only to find that it was still terrible?  It’s not the it’s offensive, or anything, in fact it would woefully fail the “Is this anything?” test, it’s just that it’s not funny.  At all.  Except to Jimmy Fallon, who laughs at length after every joke.  Unlike the audience.  Seriously, it’s like they wanted to do an experiment where a guy just goes out and bombs, every night.  I actually watch full episode of it once, hoping, praying that there was some great skit that he always saves for the end.  There wasn’t.  I went to bed basically feeling bad for the guy that he does that on national TV every night.
  • And there’s Leno.  Sort of okay in small doses, but I get sick of him in a hurry.  It seems like 50% of his comedy is making fun of how dumb other people are, and the other 50% consists of the most hackneyed, formulaic, lowest common denominator humor you can come up with.  This is probably wildly off base, but in a really tangential way, it makes me think a proposed reasoning I heard for why many non-slave owning white southern poor resisted the abolition of slavery so strongly in the first half of the 1800′s.  It’s wasn’t so much because it was economically beneficial to them, but because it gave a social structure where they were officially better than some one.  Admittedly really tangential, but that’s what Leno makes me think of – stupid humor making fun of others for being stupid.  For example, the “Headlines” segment – count how many times he calls the people who write them stupid or idiots.  The entire “Jay Walking” segment in all of it’s edited down to only the most comically wrong answers glory.  Even the monologue, where on a given night he’ll usually preface at least one joke by saying how stupid people are.  It’s one of those things I didn’t really notice for a long time, but once I did, I just couldn’t watch him anymore.
  • There’s a smattering of others across other networks, but I don’t have cable.  So, they could be great, or not, I don’t really know.

So, anyway, Craig Ferguson, telling low brow poop jokes in a way that’s funny and not particularly insulting to others, using running gags while still being fairly random, genuinely opinionated, and pulling about an hour of comedy totally out of his ass, weeknights after Dave.

Robot Skeleton Army, march on.

Comments (0) | Tags: , , | Written by Kearn on Apr 27,2010 |
Mar
22
2010

Penny for your thoughts

A few weeks ago the US Mint revealed a new design for the back of pennies.  From what I’ve seen so far, every story that has covered it (two examples) feels the need to wonder aloud why we still have pennies at all, especially since due to the wonders of inflation, it’s worth far less than other coins (such as the half penny) which have been phased out.  To my mind, there are two really obvious reasons to keep pennies.

The first is a simple matter of aesthetics, it seems silly to have the second decimal place when denoting our currency but to only use it for a 5 or 0 (which you would be stuck with, because I’m imagining people will continue to want the ability to pay with cash for a while yet, and will get bitter about being screwed out of 4 cents every time they don’t have perfect change).  Having just a 5 or 0 there breaks the whole base ten system, because the second decimal place becomes base 2 modulo 5 (I think, bit of number theory there for you).

The second is taxes.  People fight back (and rightly so) when a single cent sales tax increase is proposed for something they don’t like.  Can you imagine trying to pass a local option sales tax for schools or roads or whatever if instead of a 1 cent increase, you had to make it a 5 cent increase?  (Admittedly I don’t really understand how they calculate sales tax currently, which in Minneapolis is something like 7.775% (thanks new Twins Stadium for that last .015%). )

And aside from all of that, there’s some incredibly successful people out there with a certain, shall we say, affinity for pennies, and I for one don’t want to make some one like this angry:

Upright Citizens Brigade
Ass Pennies
www.comedycentral.com
Joke of the Day Stand-Up Comedy Free Online Games

A side note – a roll of pennies is 50 cents, so $30 in pennies is 60 rolls, a day.  Ow.

Also, I still like my strategy better.

Comments (0) | Tags: , , , | Written by Kearn on Mar 22,2010 |
Mar
02
2010

More XKCD

A few more great comics from XKCD:

Comments (0) | Tags: , , , , | Written by Kearn on Mar 02,2010 |
Mar
01
2010

Give me back that filet of human

As it’s lent, McDonald’s has brought back their Filet-O-Fish sandwich for a limited time (aka, until Easter), and they’re running a new round of derivatives of this commercial, with the same singing fish song:

Yes, I know, it’s not only annoying and a little creepy, but it will get stuck in your head until you want to kill yourself by, in an ironic twist, driving to McDonald’s and actually eating a couple of those sandwiches so your heart clogs up with enough grease to sputter to a slimy, sludgy stop.  Clever advertising ploy that is.

Anyway, I have to say that when I first heard the song, it got me thinking.  The lyrics go:

Give me back that Filet-O-Fish.

Give me that fish.

Give me back that Filet-O-Fish.

Give me that fish.

What if it were you hanging up on this wall?

If it were you in that sandwich you wouldn’t be laughing at all.

It’s particularly those last two lines that got me thinking.  What if it were me in that sandwich?  I mentally pictured a rubber-ized cheesy Lazytown version of myself on a plaque, singing that song.  And, being the (sometimes overly) logical person that I am, my next though was of course that the song ceases to make sense.  (Right, because it made so much sense before, but hang with me here.)  It wouldn’t make sense to be singing about wanting a piece of fish back, I would need to sing about wanting an equivalent piece of myself back.  And thus the song started running through my head with the word “fish” replaced by “human”.

Give me back that Filet-O-Human.

Give me that human.

Give me back that Filet-O-Human.

Give me that human.

What if it were you hanging up on this wall?

If it were you in that sandwich you wouldn’t be laughing at all.

Kind of takes it to a whole new level of weird and creepy, doesn’t it?  And now, every time I see one of those commercials on TV, I can’t help but mentally substitute “human” into the song.

Just thought I’d share.

Comments (1) | Tags: , , , , , | Written by Kearn on Mar 01,2010 |
Feb
28
2010

Steven Colbert roasts Bush at the 2006 White House Correspondents Dinner

The video is here.  Yes, it’s long, and old, but it’s good to reflect now and then on just how terrible Bush really was.  Really gets rolling at about 4 minutes in and 13:20 is my favorite.  After about 16:30 it gets sort of lame.

Comments (0) | Tags: , | Written by Kearn on Feb 28,2010 |
Feb
16
2010

In the never ending quest for the most annoying thing ever…

Have you ever thought to yourself, “You know, I’m pretty annoyed by billboards and banner ads popping up everywhere, but I just wish they could be made more intrusive”?  Or, “Insects really bug me, but they don’t quite send me into the blind rage that I’d like to have now and then”?  Well, be sub-optimally annoyed no more, I give you house flies with banner ads:

Yet another wonderful advancement of human society brought to you by (surprise surprise) the Germans.

Now if we could just find a way to use them to spread polio.

Via Kottke, I Believe in Adv, and Make.

Comments (0) | Tags: , , | Written by Kearn on Feb 16,2010 |
Feb
15
2010

Math class humor

Yes, I know we’re several holidays past Halloween, and it’s dopey, but I still think this is funny:

Via Ovablastic

Comments (0) | Tags: , , | Written by Kearn on Feb 15,2010 |

Powered by WordPress | Theme: Aeros 2.0 by TheBuckmaker.com with tweaks by Kearn