<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stray Hawkeye &#187; programming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.strayhawkeye.com/tag/programming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.strayhawkeye.com</link>
	<description>Two parts show and tell, one part soapbox.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 03:17:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Brief, Incomplete, and Mostly Wrong History of Programming Languages</title>
		<link>http://www.strayhawkeye.com/2010/07/12/a-brief-incomplete-and-mostly-wrong-history-of-programming-languages/</link>
		<comments>http://www.strayhawkeye.com/2010/07/12/a-brief-incomplete-and-mostly-wrong-history-of-programming-languages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 02:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kearn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dorkiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strayhawkeye.com/?p=2153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Brief, Incomplete, and Mostly Wrong History of Programming Languages is the funniest thing I&#8217;ve read in months.  I actually fell out of my chair laughing.  That said, I&#8217;m pretty sure you have to be a huge, enormous, mega-nerd computer geek with a decent understanding of the history of programming languages to really get much [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://james-iry.blogspot.com/2009/05/brief-incomplete-and-mostly-wrong.html">A Brief, Incomplete, and Mostly Wrong History of Programming Languages</a> is the funniest thing I&#8217;ve read in months.  I actually fell out of my chair laughing.  That said, I&#8217;m pretty sure you have to be a huge, enormous, mega-nerd computer geek with a decent understanding of the history of programming languages to really get much of any of the humor of it.  But if you are a huge, enormous, mega-nerd computer geek with a decent understanding of the history of programming languages, it doesn&#8217;t get much better than this.  Snip:</p>
<blockquote><p>1964 &#8211; John Kemeny and Thomas Kurtz create BASIC, an unstructured  programming language for non-computer scientists.</p>
<p>1965 &#8211; Kemeny  and Kurtz go to 1964.</p></blockquote>
<p>Via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2010/05/10/funny-history-of-pro.html">Boing Boing</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.strayhawkeye.com/2010/07/12/a-brief-incomplete-and-mostly-wrong-history-of-programming-languages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

