Sep
24
2009

Songs recently stuck in my head

Dominos by The Big Pink:

Seems like it would be great entrance music for something.

The ’59 Sound by The Gaslight Anthem:

Has a certain Springsteen-esque-ness to it.

I and Love and You by the Avett Brothers:

Here (the player is off in the upper right hand corner of the page).  Very sing-along-able. I especially like the line: “Tell the ones that need to know, we are headed North.”

Androgynous by The Replacements (a local band, who though long defunct, seem to have a continuously spreading influence):

Here is the only version of it I can find online where the audio quality isn’t terrible.

There’s a certain bit of a relationship theme between all of those now that I listen to them all in a row.

Comments (0) | Tags: , | Written by on Sep 24,2009 |
Sep
21
2009

Introducing the Relationship Creepiness Index (RCI)

A few days ago I was thinking about age differences in relationships.  Specifically, what is the culturally acceptable age difference between two people in a relationship.  I think everyone has a general idea of what’s okay, and it tends to fall along the lines of a couple years of age difference as teenagers, a few more as twenty-somethings, and the older you get, the more of an age range is okay.  But there’s also that fuzzy range.  The “not all out creepy” range, but where it still raises a few eyebrows and makes your close friends a little guarded and hesitant to offer any encouragement.

So, in thinking about this, it occurred to me that a better way to measure this would be the percentage of the age difference.  I’m calling this the Relationship Creepiness Index, or RCI for short.  To calculate it, take the age of the younger partner, and divide it by the age of the older partner.  If this value is between 100% and 85%, it’s pretty socially acceptable.  If it’s between 85% and 75%, you get into the makes your best friend uneasy range.  If you descend below 75%, you might as well get an unmarked white panel van and start hanging out down by the playground.  Okay, don’t actually do that, but that’s how people are probably going to see it.

In playing with the ranges a bit, percentages seem to work relatively well because they account for the fairly narrow dating range of teens and twenty-somethings, while still broadening out for the 40+ crowd, and even more so for senior citizens (though let’s not dwell on that).  The below graphic gives a thumbnail overview of the range, showing ages 14 to 95 on both axises:

rci-small

The very, very large version of the above image is here. If you want to tweak the formulas or play with the numbers, here is a copy of the spreadsheet in ODS format.

The formula and bounds are still pretty rough, but it seems like a reasonable and simple equation.  To give a few examples:

  • 20 and 23 year old dating = 39 and 45 year old dating = 52 and 60 year old dating = 87% = outer edge of the green zone, but fine.
  • 18 and 23 year old dating = 35 and 45 year old dating = 47 and 60 year old dating = 78% = well into the yellow, pretty creepy
  • 17 and 23 year old dating = 33.5 and 45 year old dating = 44 and 60 year old dating = 74% = go straight to creepytown.

It could probably use some tweaks, but it’s at least a starting point for measuring and comparing creepiness of age differences in relationships.

Comments (0) | Tags: , , , | Written by on Sep 21,2009 |

Powered by WordPress | Theme: Aeros 2.0 by TheBuckmaker.com with tweaks by Kearn